<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: final project &#8211; round two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ceidol.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/final-project-round-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ceidol.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/final-project-round-two/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:00:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: crichards</title>
		<link>http://ceidol.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/final-project-round-two/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>crichards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceidol.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I also like the two in the top right corner. I think they work more effectively when you don&#039;t have to have them against a box--they feel more like a &quot;logo&quot; to me. And both work the &quot;hot&quot; into the word really nicely, too, so it is a bit more subtle than your previous versions, which for me is a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also like the two in the top right corner. I think they work more effectively when you don&#8217;t have to have them against a box&#8211;they feel more like a &#8220;logo&#8221; to me. And both work the &#8220;hot&#8221; into the word really nicely, too, so it is a bit more subtle than your previous versions, which for me is a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mia2008</title>
		<link>http://ceidol.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/final-project-round-two/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>mia2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceidol.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I really like these new designs. I like the ones that have that swirl completely in the rectangle the best. Also, for the middle rectangular one(on the right), I would maybe try and make the swirl slightly more opaque?? Just a tiny little bit (not as much as the one underneath it). The fonts are starting to get a bit lost in it. The swirl actually reminds me of steam more than swirly chocolate but I think thats perfectly appropriate too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like these new designs. I like the ones that have that swirl completely in the rectangle the best. Also, for the middle rectangular one(on the right), I would maybe try and make the swirl slightly more opaque?? Just a tiny little bit (not as much as the one underneath it). The fonts are starting to get a bit lost in it. The swirl actually reminds me of steam more than swirly chocolate but I think thats perfectly appropriate too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://ceidol.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/final-project-round-two/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceidol.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I really love what you did with the second down on the right. The letters h o t are spaced perfectly for something like that, and I like that you went light with h-o-t. That seems like the direction I&#039;d go with it. I also like the bottom right, but it&#039;s not as simple and efficient as the other one.
Great job!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really love what you did with the second down on the right. The letters h o t are spaced perfectly for something like that, and I like that you went light with h-o-t. That seems like the direction I&#8217;d go with it. I also like the bottom right, but it&#8217;s not as simple and efficient as the other one.<br />
Great job!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
