research and refocusing

April 29, 2008

So last week in class I started working on a label for my hot chocolate container.  I’m thinking about doing sort of a puffy box (one of those hybrid type things that’s between a box and a cylinder, just a fold on each side and the circular tops “puff” the box out).  I think I’m going to have to try making one before I decide on this format as my final!  But I wanted to use this sort of packaging, as it’s one I haven’t seen before, and I think that will help it stand out on the shelves from the traditional boxes and canisters.

However, so far I’m not all that crazy about my design.  I think it has some good things about it, but I’m not that excited about it overall.  So I decided I should really sit down and do a little research before class tonight about what other hot chocolate brands are out there, and how my design can differentiate this brand.

First, there are your well known brands that I think just about every grocery store carries: Swiss Miss, Nestle, Hersheys, and also Ghiradelli and Godiva.  I’m not sure that all stores carry the last two, but they seem to be fairly well known brands overall.  Here are some quick shots of their package designs:

There are also a few additional brands I found in my searching.  The first two in the following picture are a little more upscale, the bottom three are specialty brands I found at Target:

There aren’t any major similarities that I see across all the brands.  But I will say that in general, I feel like the mainstream brands (Swiss Miss, Nestle and Hershey’s) are a little busier than the upscale brands.  Since I want my brand to be a little more calming and relaxing, I don’t think that’s a feel I want to go for.  Also, on the Swiss Miss brand, it gives a feeling of cold and winter with the snow and mountains in the background.  While I know that’s when a lot of people drink hot chocolate, I also want my brand to be something people want to buy year round.  So I definitely want to stay away from any seasonal type of imagery.

I like that the upscale, and specialty brands feel a little more clean, and detached from any seasonal imagery.  However, I still feel like they could be a little cleaner, or more modern, so perhaps this is the angle I need to take on with my brand.  The two upscale brands are probably my favorite overall, and these were the two not sold at Target, so I think bringing something a little more crisp and fresh to the shelves is what I should be focusing on.  Something that feels slightly upscale, but not so much to alienate a typical target shopper, or give off the impression it’s more expensive than it is.

Before, in my original post about the company, I used the following adjectives to describe the company: calming, relaxing, creative and unique.  I still definitely want to keep all these feelings, but I think from my research, I want to also add clean, modern and accessible.  Clean and modern in the respect that I want my product to stand out on the shelves as something a little fancier, but again, not to alienate a typical target customer.  Accessible can go two ways, first that it reaches a mass audience, and second that it’s a product people want to buy year-round.  It can still be something that’s relaxing, calm, and a bit of a treat, but also a treat you would want any season of the year, and not something so fancy you feel guilty for buying it!

So I hope this is going to help focus my work a little more for class tonight!  At least I’m learning a little more of what I don’t want, and what angle to focus on!

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized. .

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. jennyness  |  April 29, 2008 at 2:52 am

    The other common technique for the grocery store brands is a hit-you-over-the-head-with-it treatment for the logo/company name. It’s instantly recognizable – the actual product name or imagery is almost second place to the company name. The upscale brands use attractive packaging to attract the customers and the logo portion is more understated.

    I love those puff boxes! My only question is how will it stand on a shelf? The ones I’ve seen would be tough to incorporate into a traditional store display.

  • 2. christinasb  |  April 29, 2008 at 5:34 am

    I’m not sure what you mean by the puff box but I’m curious to find out what this packaging looks like. I tried doing a Google image search with puff boxes and saw some pillow boxes that I think might be the same idea. These would be nice and different from the competition if the cocoa powder were packaged as individual servings. You would just need one of the slot dividers to hold each one up on the shelf which I think grocery retailers would be able to supply for your product. It’s challenging to differentiate products. To me upscale usually translates to a minimal color palette with little clutter and just the necessary information. Maybe using one rich color with chocolate and cream and a metallic accent would be nice. Maybe if you try focusing on the typography of the package as being very simple and keeping plenty of negative space you could acheive a modern and accessible look. I like the twirls if they were very subtle in the background made at a light opacity. For the container, I think you need something a step above the paper box. I know the tin containers and the bags are not very original which is all I can think of. I’ve never seen hot chocolate packaged in a bottle which is something you could explore as long as it still felt warm and inviting. I really like the changes you’ve made to your logo. It feels more cohesive and calming. Have fun refining your design.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

April 2008
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Most Recent Posts